The rankings, which were published as part of the website’s 2018 Travelers’ Choice awards, named Singapore Airlines as the No. 1 airline in the world.
|Singapore Airlines Boeing (NYSE:BA) 777|
Second-best, according to T/A readers, was Air New Zealand. Having taken only two flights on the airline, I can’t really throw my support behind it as the second-best carrier in the world, but I agree that it is a very good airline.
U.A.E.-based Emirates was named third-best, which again aligns with the results of other surveys and my own experience. Best in the world? Again, I can’t say; I haven’t flown every one of the world’s airlines. But excellent? Based on my experiences, without question!
Fourth and fifth-best were Japan Airlines and EVA Air, which are also highly rated in other surveys, but after that, T/A readers and I part company. U.S. no-frills carrier Southwest Airlines (NYSE:LUV) was named No. 6. Seriously? The sixth-best in the world?
Please don’t misunderstand; Southwest is fine for what it is and better than many (if not most) U.S. carriers for many reasons. But it’s a no-frills, one-class carrier. How it could be ranked ahead of Qatar Airways, which was awarded high honors by the Apex Awards and Money Magazine among others, is a mystery to me.
As is No. 7, Great Britain’s Jet2.com. A bargain carrier, reviews on websites other than T/A do not support its TripAdvisor ranking. Reviews on the SKYTRAX site seem to be in either the “100 percent support” or the “Will never, ever fly them again” category. There’s very little middle ground when it comes to Jet2.com on SKYTRAX, though T/A readers apparently disagree.
The same is true of the No. 9 carrier, Brazilian airline Azul. Reviews on other sites proclaim it either “Great” or “Horrible.”
|Singapore First Class suite|
That survey, which can be found here, also presents the top airlines by region, country and class of service.
In addition to its overall ranking of Best Airlines in the World, Singapore was accorded honors as having the Best First Class and Best Economy Class cabins.
Almost all surveys are, at least in part, subjective, but this one appears to be more subjective than most. Without a stated methodology, it looks like it’s just an amalgamation of many travelers’ opinions. What those opinions are based upon, how frequently the reviewers travel, and whether they considered anything that might be measured objectively (such as seat width and pitch) is unknown.
As noted in a post earlier this week, the “best” can also be subject to serious spin. “Best at what?” is a question that is often answered in the asterisks (*).
Surveys are fun, and great fodder for the airlines. Singapore’s media machine is already cranked up and promoting its newly accorded honor.
But as far as providing useful information that travelers might use to make their travel decisions, they need to be taken with a very large grain of salt.
Visit my main page at TheTravelPro.us for more news, reviews, and personal observations on the world of upmarket travel.
Photos provided by Singapore Airlines
Click on photos to view larger images